Few in this community have any real and intimate understanding
of what war is and why it happens, and how it can be avoided, and find
themselves in lockstep with the political rhetoric of the hawks, whose
allegiance to the military-industrial
complex, which, through its hollow promises, does nought by worsen an already
damnable situation.
Many whoop and cheer in support of the Turnbull Government’s
intentions to spend lavishly on Australia’s military hardware and troop
numbers.
Those same people put a high value on personal and national security but fail to understand that the much
sought after security they ache for comes from within the individual and not
from what is intended by the Turnbull Government.
Many see any suggestion that we should limit or reduce
spending on our incongruously termed “defence” infrastructure as naïve and
something that simply panders to pacifists or others unaware of human nature
and within that what those same critics would claim is our “war instinct”.
However, according to a Professor of Psychology at the
University of Washington, David P. Barash, that instinct simply does not exist.
Professor Barash, who has researched and written about human
aggression, peace, and the sexual behaviour of animals and people, argues that
those who hold to the “war instinct” idea are wrong and dangerous in clinging to
that belief.
David P. Barash. |
In a recent article published by Aeon entitled “Is there a
War Instinct?” Barash wrote: “Similarly, walking and probably running are
adaptations; doing cartwheels or handstands are capacities.
“In my view, interpersonal violence is a human adaptation,
not unlike sexual activity, parental care, communication and so forth. It is
something we see in every human society.
“Meanwhile, war — being historically recent, as well as
erratic in worldwide distribution and variation in detail — is almost certainly
a capacity. And capacities are neither universal nor mandatory,” he writes.
The Turnbull Government’s intention to spend extravagantly
on Australia’s military hardware is not about adaptation, rather it is about capacities;
it is about preparing our nation for war.
A nation's strength is in its people, not its military
hardware.
Rather than spending ridiculous amounts of our money on
these sophisticated boys' toys, Malcolm Turnbull should be spending time with
the Australian people building them into an impenetrable force, a society able
to withstand any assaults.
Instead of buying war machines, Mr Turnbull should buy for
himself a moral compass and share the lessons its points to with his
counterparts and then, all Australians.