Humans have historically exhausted what existed and then
moved on.
Our world is full and it is time we started listening to those with ideas about slowing exponential population growth. |
The earliest small groups of humans, or tribes, settled
briefly and when the immediate environment was no longer viable or provided the
live-giving resources they needed, the group simply moved on.
Space was never a problem and the richness of the planet
continued just over the horizon and so it was simply a matter of shifting your
belongings, as few as they were, and re-establishing life in the “foyer of a
new supermarket”.
The idea that we could always move to a new place has become
entrenched in our psyche and humans have always looked longingly to the horizon
convinced the solution to their difficulties were “just out of sight”.
That assumption has been evident throughout our history right
from when the first “thinking man” emigrated from Africa to the dream of many
that we could colonize other planets.
When our numbers were few and we had room to spare, the
dynamic of staying for a season or two and then moving-on made complete sense.
When we arrived an area was rich with life and by the time
we left it was pretty well exhausted, but as human demands were relatively
small and, importantly, infrequent, nature had a largely uninterrupted chance to
repair the damage.
The idea that our planet was voluminous and forever giving
has become entrenched in human thinking, leaving many of us with the
“throw-away” mentality.
Mostly humans everywhere have always exploited what existed,
customarily to civilization’s detriment, and then moved on.
Most civilisations, history illustrates, survive for about
1000 years, except for those that were founded upon a rich stream of nature
that saw the essence of life refurbished annually or more frequently.
Nature has put out the “No vacancy” sign ending our
free-wheeling approach.
We don’t, however, appear to be paying much attention to the
fact that the world is full as we continue to live as resources upon which
modern life depend are endless – they are not and if don’t think the world is
full, ask yourself why the only survivable space for many families in India, for
example, is literally on a rubbish tip.
What do we do?
We need to support those with ideas to slow the exponential
growth of human numbers, for if we don’t do it voluntarily, a pandemic will
insist, killing billions, and we need to embrace and apply the grossly
misunderstood idea of equity.
How do we do that? First, accept and understand the damaging
reality of exponential growth; second, abandon narcissistic individuality, live
altruistically; and, third, embrace equity, fairness and justice.
Australia’s asylum-seeker dilemma is simply about people
moving to escape political crossfire and resource depletion – they are simply
exercising humanity’s historic exit option.
Well said. The difficulty seems that we are so unwilling to make some room for the 'others'. Shrinking our (ecological) footprint is political heresy. Sooner or later we will be obliged to. Then I expect it will be more uncomfortable.
ReplyDelete