Tony Abbott makes his prognostications from a building in
Canberra designed to last at least 200 years.
Australia's new parliament house - under construction in the eighties and designed to last 200 years. |
The PM’s predictions, even considered generously, might
apply to the next 20 years; just a tenth of the life of our “new” Parliament
House opened in 1988 in Canberra.
Architect Romaldo Giurgola faced constraints in
creating Australia’s new administrative home, among them that the building must
remain viable for 200 years; an idea deserving applause and one, you would hope,
would apply to decisions made by the occupants.
The ideas, policies and processes they consider
need to be arrived at and seen through the lens of the long-view; that is they need
to look far beyond the damaging limitations of the electoral cycle and plan for
a future far exceeding the limited horizon of modern politics.
Writing in the “Clock of The Long Now: Time and
Responsibility: The Ideas Behind the World’s Slowest Computer”, Stewart Brand
discusses ideas that go well beyond the 200 years mandated for our 1988
parliament house.
He argues that we should all, and that includes
politicians, be thinking thousands of years ahead.
The Shepparton-based group, Slap Tomorrow, has
its ideas and hopes clearly rooted in today, but are sharply aware that
tomorrow is going to be decidedly different place in that it will insist in on
a fresh approach to living.
Conscious that energy in all its forms allowed
for the creation of what exists today, but understanding traditional forms of
energy are finite and in serious depletion, Slap Tomorrow is organizing a
public September forum at which energy will be discussed.
The keynote speaker for that event will be the
associate professor from the University of New South Wales, Mark Diesendorf,
who presently teaches environmental studies and was the author of “Sustainable Energy Solutions for Climate Change” published last December.
Writing in his new book, Prof Diesendorf, who
like the Slap Tomorrow group is conscious of existing societal dynamics, said
that without credible visions of a sustainable future and strategies to achieve
them, it will be impossible to avoid devastating, irreversible changes to
earth’s climate.
Discussing the transition to an ecologically
sustainable, energy secure future, Prof Diesendorf said there will be “winners
and losers”
“Jobs in fossil fuels will decrease, while jobs
in energy efficiency, renewable energy and public transport will increase,” he
wrote.
He discussed the need for government policies to
ensure a socially just transition away from a fossil fuel-based society to one
relying on renewable energy.
“Unfortunately,” he wrote, “some governments
articulating the dogma of ‘leave it to the market’ appear reluctant to make any
effort to smooth industrial transitions”.
Parliament House will be there long after Mr
Abbott has left the building and we can only hope that somewhere in his legacy
is a flicker of renewable energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment