Showing posts with label happiness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label happiness. Show all posts

Monday, October 29, 2012

The wisdom of crowds is sometimes absent


Crowds have a rather special wisdom.

Surowiecki's book.
In fact the idea that crowds do have a cumulative knowledge that exceeds the individual prompted a staff writer at The New Yorker, James Surowiecki, to write a book about that very topic.

Writing in “The Wisdom of Crowds” Surowiecki explored how and why it is that many seem to instinctively know more than one.

In considering why it is the crowd is wise, he investigated many things and stripped the idea of its finery by reminding readers that on a busy footpath when hundreds are walking toward each other, collisions are almost unseen.

The crowd moving to a fro on the footpath, according to Surowiecki, instinctively avoid each other without uttering a word or making any sign.

That, he argues, is the wisdom of crowds at its most basic.

Democracy is the epitome of that wisdom to which will all unknowingly contribute, but despite the richness of that knowledge we do sometimes get it wrong.

An example of the demos failing to understand its fallibility can be seen in the outcome of the recent City of Greater Shepparton Council elections – 26 people offered themselves for one of seven positions and from that rich bounty we had the chance to assemble a group with the skills and vision to guide the city, but we didn’t.

The Goulburn Valley revolves around Greater Shepparton and so the city needs innovative leaders able to identify our strength and weaknesses, able to escape from the rigidity of repetitive behaviour and ease our communities into a new way of living; a process that will see us prosper primarily socially to give our communities an ecological and subsequently an economic advantage.

We live in world burdened by the idea that economic success is the key to social and environment matters when it is in fact a palatable life arises from exactly the opposite, for once we bring order to social and environmental matters, the economy falls into lockstep.

For too long economic concerns have driven council and although that maybe how it needs to be given the over-riding attitude of society, there comes a time when communities such as ours need to step back from the commercial rush of life and turn our attention to the broader wellbeing of people who live here.

A common, but ultimately destructive, business adage of “what gets measured, gets done” reflects the relatively simple activity of measuring monetary activity, when what we need is a council prepared to address the complex and difficult understand concepts of wellbeing, contentment and happiness.

The contemporary adversarial role of councilors needs to be collaborative, positive and friendly establishing a benchmark from which all other groups and individuals throughout the city would gauge and so adjust their contribution.

 

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Understanding how much is enough and imagining the solution


Robert and Edward
 Skidlesky's book.
Considerations about what is and what isn’t the good life are as common as opinions: everyone has one.

However growth ideologues have, in contemporary times, hijacked and distorted the human sense of what is worthy and marketed their contorted interpretation of the good life.

The modern rich, developed world is populated by people who equate the good life with accumulation of all it produces, along with the imagined enjoyment of the pleasures that stash of “stuff” brings.

Others have quite a different view and so liken the good life to one of privation and for some the higher life, or good life, only arrives after an ascetic life.

The debate about what is the good life and how you access it is as old as man, but rather than closing in on the answer, it is becoming more remote.

Many equate the good life and happiness with growth and wealth, but extensive and world-wide research point to weaknesses in that argument illustrating that once fundamental needs are answered, the good life and happiness rests on other immeasurable “goods”.

Writing in their 2012 book “How much is enough?: Money andthe Good Life” Robert and Edward Skidlesky said: “The basic goods are qualities, not quantities, objects of discernment, not measurement”.

Those “goods”, according to the Skileskys are health, security, respect, personality, harmony with nature, friendship and leisure.

Personality is about one being able to frame and execute a plan of life that reflects their tastes, temperament and conception of the good, while leisure must be accompanied by the term “purposeful”.

Interestingly, most men live much longer than they ever did, but that cannot be attributed to growth and nor can growth claim those other basic “goods” mentioned earlier.

The United Kingdom has doubled its per capita income since 1974, but residents have not tightened their grip on those basic goods, and in some respects they now have fewer of them.

“We have chased after superfluities and neglected necessities,” the Skidleskys wrote.

The good not mentioned by the Skidleskys is “imagination”, probably the most powerful, and underused, attribute of the human repertoire.

People of all stripes are obedient to the growth mandate and through a lack of imagination seem unable to conceive of a world in which they could easily and regularly access those basic goods through the abandonment ego boosting consumption.

That consumption, clearly indicated by a host of respected reports, has the world on a perilous path and so until we can imagine the good life without the need to exploit finite resources we will stumble blindly toward the abyss.

The good life waits, but our inability to forego present delights and embrace that new actuality is what darkens its dawn.